Thursday, 17th May, 2012

Arkaeology

[Published: 01-May-2004]

Holy Crap!! was my reaction in February when I read that one of the world's leading marine archaeologists, Robert Prescott of St Andrews University, was "quietly confident" that he and his team had found Charles Darwin's ship, HMS Beagle buried in the Essex marshes.

Satellite photo
Satellite photo of the supposed Noah's Ark (circled). It's uncanny.

Holy Crap (without the exclamation marks) was also my reaction yesterday when I read that Christian activist, Daniel McGivern, is "98 percent sure" that he and his team have found Noah's Ark buried in the snows of Mount Ararat.

It may well be true that there are none so blind as those who will not see, but it is surely equally true that there are none so eagle-eyed as those who are absolutely determined to see: "In one [satellite] image we saw the beams, saw the wood," said Mr McGivern.

As a rule, I have avoided (well, pretty much avoided) poking fun at religious fundamentalists on this website. I have asked them to leave me alone, and I try to return the favour. It's not that I don't find it fun pointing out how mental these fundamentalists are, you understand, it's just that it's far too easy, life is too short, and I have better things to do with my time.

But the discovery of Noah's Ark, if it were true, would be an event of such profound significance to the way we see the world that some comment is surely in order.

So here goes:

Mr McGivern, I'm sure you're not a betting man, but I'm equally sure that you wouldn't object to some juicy, anti-Darwinist propaganda. So I'll make you a deal:

If this thing you have spotted on your satellite photograph turns out to be a large section of an ancient ship, I am prepared to travel down to Kent, meet you in the village of Downe, and allow you to photograph me as I bare my peach-like arse in Charles Darwin's study window.

If, on the other hand, this thing turns out not to be a large section of an ancient ship, you must allow me to photograph you baring your arse in the church of my choice.

Mr McGivern, you claim that you are 98% sure that this thing is Noah's Ark. That means I'm offering you odds of 49:1!

Who says Darwinists and Creationists can't engage in serious debate? (Apart from me, I mean.)



Postscript:
Comments:
Susannah Anderson
Your spam preventing 5-character code thingy doesn't work. It refuses to accept my typing.
24-Aug-2006 19:21
Susannah Anderson
Addendum: it did work, on that last comment. But it didn't when I tried, repeatedly to join.
24-Aug-2006 19:22
name (required)

email (required)
(won't be published)
website url (if you'd like a link to it)

comment (required)

To prove you're not a filthy, comment-spamming robot, please enter the 5-character code shown below into the box provided:
NITSQ    
Note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are irrelevant, needlessly offensive, and so forth. I might also reformat comments to improved presentation, but I will not otherwise edit them. Creationists and other religious loonies, please note that I am not at all interested in your ridiculous views, so please don't waste your time spouting them (and my time deleting them).